有人說.....
從前, 有人從不明為什麼人一定需要朋友
更不明為什麼連吃飯, 看電影, 旅行, 逛街也一定要人陪
既然, 沒倆人是完全一樣的
與其要互相遷就
何不讓自己獨自幹喜歡幹的事
這或可會輕鬆自在一點
其實
有時人也很難弄清楚究竟是你在找人陪你
還是你在找人讓你陪...
************************************************
從哲學課學會了世界上跟本沒有"完美"這回事
那麼, 為何人還總是在追求"完美"呢?
posted by ME me @ 12:29 AM
14 Comments:
為甚麼哲學課說世界上跟本沒有"完美"這回事
便這麼相信?
甚至認定而提出 '為何人還總是在追求"完美"呢?' 的問題?
有沒有 criticize 過老師所說的是否一定對?
The idea is like this, for eg. when you draw a circle, it may look perfect as a whole. But if you look at it very very closely, you will find it's actually not perfect (just like when you enlarge the outline of a circle in the computer). Moreover, up to today's technology, no matter how accurate a machine can do, there is still some error, although it may be just +-0.000000.........1
I believe this idea, not becoz I haven't critized about it, but I still couldn't think of one thing which I can sure it's perfect. I am open to any idea as long as I can find some convincing proof. But of coz, you may also say that "cannot prove the existence" is not a proof for "non-existence".
Can you tell me what is "perfect" in this world?
One more thing I have to say is I posted that question is not because I believe human should stop craving for "Perfect" but I just wonder should that word be "Perfect" if "Perfect" is sth not existing.
"Perfect" is untouchable, uncountable and with a way of being subjectively measured. Please don't misunderstand it in the philosophic world and convey wrong concept.
Maybe I have misunderstood the concept and I am still open to other ideas.
But isn't it "Perfect" is only a concept created by human mind and it's sth not proven to be existing in the physical world? However, people are always trying to reach that "perfect" point (sth with absolutely no flaw)which is actually not existing.
I believe "Perfect" is somehow physically measurable just like if one wants to draw a perfect circle, that means one wants to draw a circle which absolutely no flaw no matter how close you look at it. But if u mean something like a perfect love or a perfect person, it's not "Perfect" itself which can only be subjectively measured, but it's the love and the charcter of a person.
The other scenario is that you may be the only one who think the one with you are the "Perfect Love". It's just the way how you interpret such conceptual things. Seems you never study philosophy.
In that case, i believe it's just that person has misintepreted or misused the word "Perfect". That person may think the other half is "Perfect" because his/her love has far outweighed the mismatch (although which maybe not important) between them. Of course nowadays, people understand what does that person mean by his/her "Perfect Love" yet it's not really "Perfect" genuinely. It's just an expression of which the true meaning of the word "Perfect" has been distorted.
Honestly, I was not an actual philosophy student but I did take a few courses in this subject before.
Thanks for sharing your idea, there is no absolute answer in philosopy and I feel interested in the discussion with you.
it's just about different definitions, base on meme's definition, she thinks a person may has misunderstand and misued the word 'perfect', but actually that person may just has a different definition and meaning towards the word 'perfect', and it doesn't mean that person has 'misued' or 'misunderstand' the world.
let's be open and put ourselves in the other shoes, though it may not be possible in the 'absolute' reality....
Um..... himitsi and/or anonymous, I can't see you could ever provide any points or reasons supporting your idea and therefore, I am not convinced a bit with your idea yet.
In addition, I can't see any relation between my idea and putting myself into other shoes.
But one thing I find it very interesting is that it seems to me that you strongly disagree with me or even hate me (of coz I may be wrong), but still, you keep checking out my blog. Is there any chance that you know me in person?
i never attempt to convince you
i just express another view, doesn't mean i have to convince u.
why can't u just allow different ideas to exist?
have you heard of the idea of habamas cafe?
Firstly, it's fine if you don't allow any criticism or discussion, but I have to declare that himitsu and anonymous are different readers here. I don't want to get involved into it in any way!
Secondly, I never try to convince anyone to follow the idea as mine. Plus, I agree with you that there is no absolute answer in philosopy. If you don't agree with others' agruement, just simply ignore them. Don't be easily get too much in it.
Thirdly, you should be happy enough as there is a reader "himitsu" keep checking you out right here.. that means your blog is kinda attractive to readers? Let's perceive things indifferently, I think it will make you happier. You have your every rights to blog, voice out anything.. just be the way you're!
(I'm not your enemy.. hahahaha :>)
Cool!
It's fine that both of you are not attempting to convince me. But I have to declare that I do welcome and open to any criticism or discussion. And, I totally accept that there are different views in the world. However, I do like to see some points supporting the discussion instead of not stating out an idea or critism.
I agree that ppl could use "Perfect" with their own definition as said earlier that I understand other ppl can get what does it mean too. What I want to say is just that "perfect" isn't the true "perfect" in the universe in my opinion. It's because I can't find a proof of "Perfect" in reality yet.
Himitsu, I haven't heard about Habamas cafe. Do drop some points if you feel like to.....
be happy
www.dhamma.org
Btw, Thx Anonymonus and Shaner for your comments :>
Post a Comment
<< Home